4.8 Article

In Situ Observations of Nanoparticle Early Development Kinetics at Mineral-Water Interfaces

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 21, 页码 8182-8189

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es101491e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF-DOE Environmental Molecular Science Institute at Pennsylvania State University
  2. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. International Center for Advanced Renewable Energy & Sustainability (I-CARES) at Washington University in St. Louis
  4. Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The early development of nanoparticles at mineral-water interfaces exerts crucial influences on the sequestration and transport of aqueous toxic species originating from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation often occur simultaneously, making it difficult to sort out whether toxic species are transported as free species, sorbed on nanoparticle surfaces, or trapped between aggregated nanoparticles. Here, using a newly developed X-ray scattering setup, we show how homogeneous nucleation and growth can be quantitatively separated from heterogeneous processes under aqueous conditions in real-time. Under conditions found in acid-mine-drainage (at pH 3.6 and [Fe3+] =10(-4) M), heterogeneous nucleation of iron oxide nanoparticles on quartz dominated homogeneous nucleation by a factor of 192 (by par-fide volume). The smallest heterogeneously formed nanoparticles had radii of 1.7 +/- 0.5 nm, significantly smaller than the size estimated using classical nucleation theory (CNT). Based on the data, the dominant nucleation and growth mechanisms of iron oxide nanoparticles depending on ionic strength were presented. Our findings have implications for the formation and transport of nanoparticles, and thus toxins, in both environmental and biological systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据