4.8 Article

Dust from UK Primary School Classrooms and Daycare Centers: The Significance of Dust As a Pathway of Exposure of Young UK Children to Brominated Flame Retardants and Polychlorinated Biphenyls

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 4198-4202

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es100750s

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Scientific Foundation of Flanders (FWO)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council
  3. Unilever [NER/S/U/2006/14255]
  4. Food Standards Agency [NE/F006470/1]
  5. Egyptian government
  6. Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs), tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBP-A), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were measured in floor dustfrom U.K. child daycare center and primary school classrooms (n = 43, 36 for PCBs). Concentrations of HBCDs exceeded significantly (p < 0.05) those reported previously for U.K. houses and offices, while those of TBBP-A exceeded significantly those in U.K. cars and offices. PCB concentrations were statistically indistinguishable from those in U.K. house dust but lower than in U.S. classroom dust, while BDEs 47, 99, 100, 153, 196, 197, 203, and 209 in classrooms were significantly below concentrations in U.K. cars. Exposure of young U.K. children via classroom dust exceeds that of U.K. adults via office dust for all contaminants monitored. Overall dust exposure of young U.K. children was estimated including car, classroom, and house dust Exposure to TBBP-A was well below a U.K. health-based limit value (HBLV). Though no HBLVs exist for non-dioxin-like PCBs and HBCDs; dust exposure to PCBs fell well below U.K. dietary and inhalation exposure. Contrastingly, a high-end estimate of HBCD dust exposure exceeded U.K. dietary exposure substantially. Moreover, high-end estimates of dust exposure to BDE-99 and BDE-209 (4.3 and 13000 ng/kg bw/day, respectively) exceeded HBLVs of 0.23-0.30 and 7000 ng/kg bw/day respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据