4.8 Article

Spatial Variability of Intake Fractions for Canadian Emission Scenarios: A Comparison between Three Resolution Scales

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 4217-4224

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es902983b

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIRAIG
  2. Alcan
  3. Arcelor-Mittal
  4. Bell Canada
  5. Cascades
  6. Eco-Entreprises-Quebec/Recyc-Quebec
  7. Groupe EDF/GDF-SUEZ
  8. Hydro-Quebec
  9. Johnson Johnson
  10. Mouvement des caisses Desjardins
  11. RONA
  12. Total
  13. Veolia Environnement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatially differentiated intake fractions (iFs) linked to Canadian emissions of toxic organic chemicals were developed using the multimedia and multipathways fate and exposure model IMPACT 2002. The fate and exposure of chemicals released to the Canadian environment were modeled with a single regional mass-balance model and three models that provided multiple mass-balance regions within Canada. These three models were based on the Canadian subwatersheds (172 zones), ecozones (15 zones), and provinces (13 zones). Releases of 32 organic chemicals into water and air were considered. This was done in order to (i) assess and compare the spatial variability of iFs within and across the three levels of regionalization and (ii) compare the spatial iFs to nonspatial ones. Results showed that iFs calculated using the subwatershed resolution presented a higher spatial variability (up to 10 orders of magnitude for emissions into water) than the ones based on the ecozones and provinces, implying that higher spatial resolution could potentially reduce uncertainty in iFs and, therefore, increase the discriminating power when assessing and comparing toxic releases for known emission locations. Results also indicated that, for an unknown emission location, a model with high spatial resolution such as the subwatershed model could significantly improve the accuracy of a generic iF. Population weighted iFs span up to 3 orders of magnitude compared to nonspatial iFs calculated by the one-box model. Less significant differences were observed when comparing spatial versus nonspatial iFs from the ecozones and provinces, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据