4.8 Article

Carbon Nanofiber Polymer Composites: Evaluation of Life Cycle Energy Use

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 2078-2084

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es802101x

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency [R832532]
  2. United States National Science Foundation [EEC-0425626]
  3. EPA [909142, R832532] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Holistic evaluation of emerging nanotechnologies using systems analysis is pivotal for guiding their safe and sustainable development While toxicity studies of engineered nanomaterials are essential, understanding of the potential large scale impacts of nanotechnology is also critical for developing sustainable nanoproducts. This work evaluates the life cycle energetic impact associated with the production and use of carbon nanofiber (CNF) reinforced polymer nanocomposites (PNC). Specifically, both simple CNF and carbon nanofiber-glass fiber (CNF-GF) hybrid PNCs are evaluated and compared with steel for equal stiffness design. Life cycle inventory is developed based on published literature and best available engineering information. A cradle-to-gate comparison suggests that for equal stiffness design, CNF reinforced PNCs are 1.6-12 times more energy intensive than steel. It is anticipated that the product use phase may strongly influence whether any net savings in life cycle energy consumption can be realized. A case study involving the use of CNF and CNF-GF reinforced PNCs in the body panels of automobiles highlights that the use of PNCs with lower CNF loading ratios has the potential for net life cycle energy savings relative to steel owing to improved fuel economy benefits. Other factors such as cost, toxicity impact of CNF, and end-of-life issues specific to CNFs need to be considered to evaluate the final economic and environmental performance of CNF reinforced PNC materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据