4.8 Article

Novel Relationship between Hydroxyl Radical Initiation and Surface Group of Ceramic Honeycomb Supported Metals for the Catalytic Ozonation of Nitrobenzene in Aqueous Solution

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 4157-4163

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es900084w

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20080440130]
  2. Scheme of 863 High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA06Z306]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. National Creative Research Groups [50821002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparative experiments have been performed to investigate the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene and the removal efficiency of TOC in aqueous solution by the processes of ceramic honeycomb supported different metals (Fe, Ni, and Zn) catalytic ozonation, indicating that the modification with metals can enhance the activity of ceramic honeycomb for the catalytic ozonation of nitrobenzene, and the loading percentage of metal and the metallicity respectively presents a positive influence on the degradation of nitrobenzene. The degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene is determined by the initiation of hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) according to a good linear correlation in all the processes of modified ceramic honeycomb catalytic ozonation at the different loading percentages of metals. The modification of ceramic honeycomb with metals results in the conversion of the pH at the point of zero charge (pH(pzc)) and the evolution of surface groups. Divergence from the conventional phenomenon, the enhancement mechanism of ozone decomposition on the modified ceramic honeycomb with metals is proposed due to the basic attractive forces of electrostatic forces or/and hydrogen bonding. Consequently, a novel relationship between the initiation of (OH)-O-center dot and the surface-OH2+ group on the modified catalyst is established based on the synergetic effect between homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据