4.8 Article

Impacts of halogen additions on mercury oxidation, in a slipstream selective catalyst reduction (SCR), reactor when burning sub-bituminous coal

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 256-261

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es071281e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comparison of impacts of halogen species on the elemental mercury (Hg(O)) oxidation in a real coal-derived flue gas atmosphere. It is reported there is a higher percentage of Hg(O) in the flue gas when burning sub-bituminous coal (herein Powder River Basin (PRB) coal) and lignite, even with the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR). The higher Hg(O)concentration in the flue gas makes it difficult to use the wet-FGD process for the mercury emission control in coal-fired utility boilers. Investigation of enhanced Hg(O) oxidation by addition of hydrogen halogens (HF, HCl, HBr, and Hl) was conducted in a slipstream reactor with and without SCR catalysts when burning PRB coal. Two commercial SCR catalysts were evaluated. SCR catalyst no. 1 showed higher efficiencies of both NO reduction and Hg(O) oxidation than those of SCR catalyst no. 2. NH3 addition seemed to inhibit the Hg(O) oxidation, which indicated competitive processes between NH3 reduction and Hg(O) oxidation on the surface of SCR catalysts. The hydrogen halogens, in the order of impact on Hg(O) oxidation, were HBr, Hl, and HCl or HF. Addition of HBr at approximately 3 ppm could achieve 80% Hg(O) oxidation. Addition of HI at approximately 5 ppm could achieve 40% Hg(O) oxidation. In comparison to the empty reactor, 40% Hg(O) oxidation could be achieved when HCI addition was up to 300 ppm. The enhanced Hg(O) oxidation by addition of HBr and HI seemed not to be correlated to the catalytic effects by both evaluated SCR catalysts. The effectiveness of conversion of hydrogen halogens to halogen molecules or interhalogens seemed to be attributed to their impacts on Hg(O) oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据