4.7 Article

Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 52-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002

关键词

Joint knowledge production; Co-production; Science-policy interfaces; Sustainable development; Mode-2; Post normal science; Transdisciplinarity; Sociology of knowledge; Climate change adaptation; Regional scale; The Netherlands

资金

  1. Dutch National Partnership for Sustainable Earth Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matching supply and demand for knowledge in the fields of global change and sustainability is a daunting task. Science and public policy differ in their timeframes, epistemologies, objectives, process-cycles and criteria for judging the quality of knowledge, while global change and sustainability issues involve value pluralities and large uncertainties. In literature and in practice, it is argued that joint knowledge production in projects through collaboration between (and within) science and policy serves as a means to bridge the gap between the two domains. However, an assessment framework for analysing the merits and limitations of such projects, identifying good practices and enabling adaptive management as well as social learning had not yet been developed. This paper aims to develop such a framework. We portray joint knowledge production projects as policy arrangements in which the degree of success depends on the actors involved, contents of dominant discourses, presence of rules and the availability of resources. Literature was discussed to specify these four dimensions into seven success conditions for joint knowledge production. Scholars, boundary organizations and actors in projects can use the framework for retrospective analyses of projects, providing joint knowledge production with the empirical basis it still requires. The framework can also be used for promoting reflection in action as well as for formative assessments enabling social learning. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据