4.3 Review

Toward dynamic global vegetation models for simulating vegetation-climate interactions and feedbacks: recent developments, limitations, and future challenges

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 333-353

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/A10-016

关键词

dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM); vegetation modelling; climate change; coupling; global climate model (GCM); land surface scheme (LSS)

资金

  1. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a lack in representation of biosphere atmosphere interactions in current climate models. To fill this gap, one may introduce vegetation dynamics in surface transfer schemes or couple global climate models (GCMs) with vegetation dynamics models. As these vegetation dynamics models were not designed to be included in GCMs, how are the latest generation dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) suitable for use in global climate studies? This paper reviews the latest developments in DGVM modelling as well as the development of DGVM-GCM coupling in the framework of global climate studies. Limitations of DGVM and coupling are shown and the challenges of these methods are highlighted. During the last decade, DGVMs underwent major changes in the representation of physical and biogeochemical mechanisms such as photosynthesis and respiration processes as well as in the representation of regional properties of vegetation. However, several limitations such as carbon and nitrogen cycles, competition, land-use and land-use changes, and disturbances have been identified. In addition, recent advances in model coupling techniques allow the simulation of the vegetation atmosphere interactions in GCMs with the help of DGVMs. Though DGVMs represent a good alternative to investigate vegetation atmosphere interactions at a large scale, some weaknesses in evaluation methodology and model design need to be further investigated to improve the results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据