4.7 Article

Emission factor of ammonia (NH3) from on-road vehicles in China: tunnel tests in urban Guangzhou

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064027

关键词

emission factors; tunnel tests; ammonia; nitrogen oxide; emissions; vehicles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41025012/41121063]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB05010200]
  3. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Funds [U0833003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonia (NH3) is the primary alkaline gas in the atmosphere that contributes to formation of secondary particles. Emission of NH3 from vehicles, particularly gasoline powered light duty vehicles equipped with three-way catalysts, is regarded as an important source apart from emissions from animal wastes and soils, yet measured emission factors for motor vehicles are still not available in China, where traffic-related emission has become an increasingly important source of air pollutants in urban areas. Here we present our tunnel tests for NH3 from motor vehicles under 'real world conditions' in an urban roadway tunnel in Guangzhou, a central city in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region in south China. By attributing all NH3 emissions in the tunnel to light-duty gasoline vehicles, we obtained a fuel-based emission rate of 2.92 +/- 0.18 g L-1 and a mileage-based emission factor of 229.5 +/- 14.1 mg km(-1). These emission factors were much higher than those measured in the United States while measured NOx emission factors (7.17 +/- 0.60 g L-1 or 0.56 +/- 0.05 g km(-1)) were contrastingly near or lower than those previously estimated by MOBILE/PART5 or COPERT IV models. Based on the NH3 emission factors from this study, on-road vehicles accounted for 8.1% of NH3 emissions in the PRD region in 2006 instead of 2.5% as estimated in a previous study using emission factors taken from the Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) in the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据