4.7 Article

Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019

关键词

flood risk; global modelling; global scale; flooding; risk assessment

资金

  1. VENI grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Directorate of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
  3. European Union FP7 ENHANCE project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globally, economic losses from flooding exceeded $ 19 billion in 2012, and are rising rapidly. Hence, there is an increasing need for global-scale flood risk assessments, also within the context of integrated global assessments. We have developed and validated a model cascade for producing global flood risk maps, based on numerous flood return-periods. Validation results indicate that the model simulates interannual fluctuations in flood impacts well. The cascade involves: hydrological and hydraulic modelling; extreme value statistics; inundation modelling; flood impact modelling; and estimating annual expected impacts. The initial results estimate global impacts for several indicators, for example annual expected exposed population (169 million); and annual expected exposed GDP ($ 1383 billion). These results are relatively insensitive to the extreme value distribution employed to estimate low frequency flood volumes. However, they are extremely sensitive to the assumed flood protection standard; developing a database of such standards should be a research priority. Also, results are sensitive to the use of two different climate forcing datasets. The impact model can easily accommodate new, user-defined, impact indicators. We envisage several applications, for example: identifying risk hotspots; calculating macro-scale risk for the insurance industry and large companies; and assessing potential benefits (and costs) of adaptation measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据