4.7 Article

Assessing summertime urban air conditioning consumption in a semiarid environment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034022

关键词

energy; sustainability; built environment; regional climate modeling; air conditioning; urban meteorology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ATM-0934592, DMS-0940314]
  2. Center for Integrated Solutions to Climate Challenges at Arizona State University
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0934592] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluation of built environment energy demand is necessary in light of global projections of urban expansion. Of particular concern are rapidly expanding urban areas in environments where consumption requirements for cooling are excessive. Here, we simulate urban air conditioning (AC) electric consumption for several extreme heat events during summertime over a semiarid metropolitan area with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled to a multilayer building energy scheme. Observed total load values obtained from an electric utility company were split into two parts, one linked to meteorology (i.e., AC consumption) which was compared to WRF simulations, and another to human behavior. WRF-simulated non-dimensional AC consumption profiles compared favorably to diurnal observations in terms of both amplitude and timing. The hourly ratio of AC to total electricity consumption accounted for similar to 53% of diurnally averaged total electric demand, ranging from similar to 35% during early morning to similar to 65% during evening hours. Our work highlights the importance of modeling AC electricity consumption and its role for the sustainable planning of future urban energy needs. Finally, the methodology presented in this article establishes a new energy consumption-modeling framework that can be applied to any urban environment where the use of AC systems is prevalent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据