4.7 Article

Linear disturbances on discontinuous permafrost: implications for thaw-induced changes to land cover and drainage patterns

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025006

关键词

permafrost thaw; active layer; resource exploration; linear disturbances; peatlands

资金

  1. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  3. Denedeh Resources Committee
  4. Dehcho First Nations
  5. Fort Simpson Metis Local [52]
  6. Liidlii Kue First Nation
  7. Village of Fort Simpson

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the zone of discontinuous permafrost, linear disturbances such as winter roads and seismic lines severely alter the hydrology, ecology, and ground thermal regime. Continued resource exploration in this environment has created a need to better understand the processes causing permafrost thaw and concomitant changes to the terrain and ground cover, in order to efficiently reduce the environmental impact of future exploration through the development of best management practices. In a peatland 50 km south of Fort Simpson, NWT, permafrost thaw and the resulting ground surface subsidence have produced water-logged linear disturbances that appear not to be regenerating permafrost, and in many cases have altered the land cover type to resemble that of a wetland bog or fen. Subsidence alters the hydrology of plateaus, developing a fill and spill drainage pattern that allows some disturbances to be hydrologically connected with adjacent wetlands via surface flow paths during periods of high water availability. The degree of initial disturbance is an important control on the extent of permafrost thaw and thus the overall potential recovery of the linear disturbance. Low impact techniques that minimize ground surface disturbance and maintain original surface topography by eliminating windrows are needed to minimize the impact of these linear disturbances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据