4.7 Article

Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010

关键词

soy; cattle; deforestation; Amazonia; biofuel

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NASA [NNX07AF16G]
  3. Amazon Forest
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0822799] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0822597, 1157952] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expansion of global demand for soy products and biofuel poses threats to food security and the environment. One environmental impact that has raised serious concerns is loss of Amazonian forest through indirect land use change (ILUC), whereby mechanized agriculture encroaches on existing pastures, displacing them to the frontier. This phenomenon has been hypothesized by many researchers and projected on the basis of simulation for the Amazonian forests of Brazil. It has not yet been measured statistically, owing to conceptual difficulties in linking distal land cover drivers to the point of impact. The present article overcomes this impasse with a spatial regression model capable of linking the expansion of mechanized agriculture in settled agricultural areas to pasture conversions on distant, forest frontiers. In an application for a recent period (2003-2008), the model demonstrates that ILUC is significant and of considerable magnitude. Specifically, a 10% reduction of soy in old pasture areas would have decreased deforestation by as much as 40% in heavily forested counties of the Brazilian Amazon. Evidently, the voluntary moratorium on primary forest conversions by Brazilian soy farmers has failed to stop the deforestation effects of expanding soy production. Thus, environmental policy in Brazil must pay attention to ILUC, which can complicate efforts to achieve its REDD targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据