4.7 Article

A case-cohort study examining lifetime exposure to inorganic arsenic in drinking water and diabetes mellitus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 33-38

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.02.005

关键词

Arsenic; Drinking water; Diabetes mellitus; Geospatial modeling; Urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Consumption of drinking water with high levels of inorganic arsenic (over 500 mu g/L) has been associated with type II diabetes mellitus (DM), but previous studies have been inconclusive about risks at lower levels (< 100 mu g/L). We present a case-cohort study based on individual estimates of lifetime arsenic exposure to examine the relationship between chronic low-level arsenic exposure and risk of DM. Methods: This case-cohort study included 141 cases of DM diagnosed between 1984 and 1998 as part of the prospective San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. A comparison sub-cohort of 488 participants was randomly sampled from 936 eligible participants who were disease free at baseline. Individual lifetime arsenic exposure estimates were determined using a methodology that incorporates the use of a structured interview to determine lifetime residence and employment history, geospatial modeling of arsenic concentrations in drinking water, and urine arsenic concentrations. A Cox proportional hazards model with known DM risk factors as time-dependent covariates was used to assess the association between lifetime exposure to inorganic arsenic in drinking water and incident DM. Results: Our findings show a significant association between inorganic arsenic exposure and DM risk (hazard ratio [HR]=1.27, 95%=1.01, 1.59 per 15 mu g/L) while adjusting for ethnicity and time varying covariates age, body mass index and physical activity level. Conclusions: Exposure to low-level inorganic arsenic in drinking water is associated with increased risk for type II DM in this population based on a comprehensive lifetime exposure assessment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据