4.5 Article

Mann-Kendall trend of pollutants, temperature and humidity over an urban station of India with forecast verification using different ARIMA models

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 186, 期 8, 页码 4719-4742

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3733-6

关键词

Mann-Kendall trend; ARIMA; Pollutants; Meteorological parameters

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST) under PURSE programme
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST) under INSPIRE programme
  3. MoES, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present research is to identify the trends in the concentrations of few atmospheric pollutants and meteorological parameters over an urban station Kolkata (22A degrees 32' N; 88A degrees 20' E), India, during the period from 2002 to 2011 and subsequently develop models for precise forecast of the concentration of the pollutants and the meteorological parameters over the station Kolkata. The pollutants considered in this study are sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulates of size 10-mu m diameters (PM10), carbon monoxide (CO) and tropospheric ozone (O3). The meteorological parameters considered are the surface temperature and relative humidity. The Mann-Kendall, non-parametric statistical analysis is implemented to observe the trends in the data series of the selected parameters. A time series approach with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling is used to provide daily forecast of the parameters with precision. ARIMA models of different categories; ARIMA (1, 1, 1), ARIMA (0, 2, 2) and ARIMA (2, 1, 2) are considered and the skill of each model is estimated and compared in forecasting the concentration of the atmospheric pollutants and meteorological parameters. The results of the study reveal that the ARIMA (0, 2, 2) is the best statistical model for forecasting the daily concentration of pollutants as well as the meteorological parameters over Kolkata. The result is validated with the observation of 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据