4.5 Article

Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity assessment of exhaust particulates from diesel-powered buses

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 185, 期 10, 页码 8707-8713

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3206-3

关键词

Diesel exhaust emission ecotoxicity; Genotoxicity; Kinetic luminescent bacteria test; Direct contact test

资金

  1. Hungarian Government
  2. European Union
  3. European Social Fund
  4. [TAMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0003]
  5. [TAMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diesel exhaust is one of the major sources of fine and ultra-fine particulate matter in urban air. Toxicity of diesel-powered engine emissions has been quite widely assessed; however, much less information is available on their ecotoxicity. In our study, the kinetic version of the Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition bioassay based on the ISO 21338:2010 standard was used to characterise the ecotoxicity of diesel-powered buses. It is a direct contact test in which solid samples are tested in suspension and test organisms are in direct contact with toxic particles. The age of the selected buses fell into a wide range; the oldest one was produced in 1987. Diesel engines of different emission standards (Euro0-Euro4) were included. Measured EC50 values of Euro0-Euro1 engine emissions fell into the same range, 1.24-0.96 mu g ml(-1), respectively. On the contrary, emission of Euro4 vehicle proved to be non-toxic. Genotoxic potential of the samples was also estimated, using the colorimetric SOS-chromotest (TM). Genotoxicity was detected also for Euro0 and Euro1 buses, showing correlation with the ecotoxic potential. The fact that the particulates from Euro4 vehicles did not show ecotoxic/genotoxic effect implies that replacing old Euro1 and Euro2 buses can be a highly effective solution for reducing environmental hazard of automotive emissions. The whole-aerosol testing method is a cheap alternative that can be used in engine developments and emission control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据