4.5 Article

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in European catfish from the upper Po River basin

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 186, 期 4, 页码 2313-2320

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3539-y

关键词

PAHs; European catfish; Po River basin; HPLC

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a major concern in environmental studies as many of them have been labeled as probable carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 1983). Due to their lipophilic properties and resistance to degradation, PAHs can accumulate in organic tissue. As a consequence, alarming concentrations of these compounds have been found in many aquatic species. The European catfish (Silurus glanis) is a top food chain predator that is considered to be a reliable bio-indicator of environmental pollution. From 2009 to 2011, 54 specimens of S. glanis were captured from four different sites covering the area of the Po River basin (Northern Italy). Fish muscles were analyzed in the laboratory to determine the levels of nine PAHs, namely naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, and benz[a]pyrene (BaP), which were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The total average concentration of PAHs was 26.90 +/- 49.50 ng g(-1) (min 0.60, max 275.75 ng g(-1)). Analysis showed that 9.20 % of the fish muscles exceeded the maximum levels of 2 ng g(-1) set for BaP by European regulations (Commission Regulation (EC), 2006). Values measured for benz[a]pyrene ranged from 0.05 to 8.20 ng g(-1) (mean 1.07 +/- 1.58 ng g(-1)). Chrysene and benz[a]anthracene, both considered potential human carcinogens (PAH2), were found at levels of 4.40 and 0.05 ng g(-1) (mean values), respectively. The highest mean concentration was recorded for anthracene (12.92 ng g(-1)), which has been recently included in the list of substances of very high concern (SVHC) as reported by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA 1-9, 2009).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据