4.5 Article

Spatial distribution and multiple sources of heavy metals in the water of Chaohu Lake, Anhui, China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 184, 期 5, 页码 2763-2773

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2149-9

关键词

Chaohu Lake; Heavy metal distribution; Lake water

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40873070, 40903039]
  2. Research Foundation for Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20093402110001]
  3. Special projects of major national science and technology [2009ZX05039-003]
  4. National Foundation of Anhui Education [KJ2008A147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a survey for the spatial distribution of heavy metals in Chaohu Lake of China was conducted. Sixty-two surface water samples were collected from entire lake including three of its main river entrances. This is the first systematic report concerning the content, distribution, and origin of heavy metals (Cu, Cr, Cd, Hg, Zn, and Ni) in the Chaohu Lake water. The results showed that heavy metals (Cu, Cr, Zn, and Ni) concentrations in the estuary of Nanfei River were relatively higher than those in the other areas, while content of Hg is higher in the southeast lake than northwest lake. Moreover, Cd has locally concentration in the surface water from the entire Chaohu Lake. The heavy metal average concentrations, except Hg, were lower than the cutoff values for the first-grade water quality (China Environment Quality Standard) which was set as the highest standard to protect the social nature reserves. The Hg content is between the grades three and four water quality, and other heavy metals contents are higher than background values. The aquatic environment of Chaohu Lake has apparently been contaminated. Both the cluster analysis (CA) and correlation analysis provide information about the origin of heavy metals in the Lake. Our findings indicated that agricultural activities and adjacent plants chimneys may contribute the most to Cd and Hg contamination of Chaohu Lake, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据