4.5 Article

An assessment of selected trace elements in intertidal surface sediments collected from the Peninsular Malaysia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 169, 期 1-4, 页码 457-472

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1189-x

关键词

Trace elements; Surface sediments; Intertidal areas; Sediment quality guideline; Peninsular Malaysia

资金

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science [19380224]
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Malaysia [06-01-04-SF0715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrations of 11 trace elements (V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Ag, Cd, Pb, and U) were determined in the intertidal surface sediments of Peninsular Malaysia. The average trace element concentrations are ranked as follows: Zn > V > As > Cr > Pb > Cu > Ni > Co > U > g > Cd. Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQGs) employed in present study are the Australia and New Zealand joint guideline (ANZECC/ARMCANZ), and the Hong Kong authorities. From the pooled data, none of these trace elements have the average concentration above the ISQG-high values. However, As and Ag average concentrations were over the ISQG-low values. Some elements were found to have the average concentration above the ISQG-high and/or ISQG-low in certain locations, including Kampung Pasir Putih (JPP), Lumut Port (ALP), Kuala Perai (PKP), Port Dickson (NPD), and others. The lowest and highest concentrations in a specific sampling location and maritime area varied among the elements, variations that were greatly affected by natural and anthropogenic activities in a given area. For each trace element, there were various levels of concentration among the sampling locations and maritime areas. These patterns indicated pollutant sources of an element for each area perhaps derived from nearby areas and did not widely distributed to other locations. It is necessary for Malaysia to develop an ISQG for effective quick screening and evaluation of the coastal environment of Peninsular Malaysia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据