4.5 Article

Estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration using field spectral data: a case study in inland Case-II waters, North China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
卷 158, 期 1-4, 页码 105-116

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0568-z

关键词

Remote sensing; Chlorophyll-a; Chlorophyll-a specific absorption coefficient; Model; Inland Case-II waters

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX3-SW-356, DB2X-2-30]
  2. Chinese Academy of Science and Jilin province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the remote sensing of chlorophyll-a (Chla) in inland Case-II waters, the assumption that the optical parameter of Chla specific absorption coefficient a(ph)* remains constant usually restrains application of many models. In this paper, we presented a newly developed model [R-rs(-1)(lambda(1)) - R-rs(-1)(lambda(2))] x R-rs(lambda(3)) x a(ph)*(-1)(lambda(1)) which was improved on a previous three-band model to isolate interferences from a(ph)*. In terms of the importance of water optical properties in the model development, spectral and absorption characteristics were analyzed for Shitoukoumen Reservoir and Songhua Lake in Northeast China, as typical examples of inland Case-II waters. Both waters showed overwhelming absorption sum of tripton and chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) owing to their relatively low Chla contents (1.53 to 19.35 mu gl(-1)). According to the optical characteristics of waters studied, optimal positions for lambda(1), lambda(2) and lambda(3) were spectrally tuned to be at 664, 684 and 705 nm, respectively. The model allowed accurate Chla estimation with a determination coefficient (R-2) close to 0.98 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.87 mu gl(-1). Comparison of different models further showed the stability of the improved model, implying its potential use in water color remote sensing. Although the findings underline the rationale behind the improved model, an extensive database containing data in different water conditions and water types is required to generalize its application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据