4.7 Article

Sensitivity and uncertainty propagation in coupled models for assessing smallholder farmer food security in the Olifants River Basin, South Africa

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 228-240

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.021

关键词

Family balance; Integrated model; Sensitivity; Smallholder farming system; Uncertainty

资金

  1. The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) [PN17]
  2. International Foundation for Science [W4029-1, S/4596-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using family balance (i.e., combined net farm and non-farm incomes less family expenses), an output from an integrated model, which couples water resource, agronomic and socio-economic models, its sensitivity and uncertainty are evaluated for five smallholder farming groups (A E) in the Olifants Basin. The crop management practiced included conventional rainfed, untied ridges, planting basins and supplemental irrigation. Scatter plots inferred the most sensitive variables affecting family balance, while the Monte Carlo method, using random sampling, was used to propagate the uncertainty in the model inputs to produce family balance probability distributions. A non-linear correlation between in-season rainfall and family balance arises from several factors that affect crop yield, indicating the complexity of farm family finance resource-base in relation to climate, crop management practices and environmental resources of soil and water. Stronger relationships between family balance and evapotranspiration than with in-season rainfall were obtained. Sensitivity analysis results suggest more targeted investment effort in data monitoring of yield, in-season rainfall, supplemental irrigation and maize price to reduce family balance uncertainty that varied from 42% to 54% at 90% confidence level. While supplemental irrigation offers the most marginal increase in yields, its wide adoption is limited by availability of water and infrastructure cost. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据