4.7 Article

The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 4-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011

关键词

Subjectivity; Uncertainty; Expert system; Expert elicitation; Stakeholder; Participatory modelling

资金

  1. UK Research Councils [RES-229-25-0009-A, RES-227-25-0001]
  2. RELU
  3. UK Environment Agency [SC050035]
  4. ESRC [RES-229-25-0009-A] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-229-25-0009-A] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inevitable though frequently informal use of expert opinion in modelling, the increasing number of models that incorporate formally expert opinion from a diverse range of experience and stakeholders, arguments for participatory modelling and analytic-deliberative-adaptive approaches to managing complex environmental problems, and an expanding but uneven literature prompt this critical review and analysis. Aims are to propose common definitions, identify and categorise existing concepts and practice, and provide a frame of reference and guidance for future environmental modelling. The extensive literature review and classification conducted demonstrate that a broad and inclusive definition of experts and expert opinion is both required and part of current practice. Thus an expert can be anyone with relevant and extensive or in-depth experience in relation to a topic of interest. The literature review also exposes informal model assumptions and modeller subjectivity, examines in detail the formal uses of expert opinion and expert systems, and critically analyses the main concepts of, and issues arising in, expert elicitation and the modelling of associated uncertainty. It is noted that model scrutiny and use of expert opinion in modelling will benefit from formal, systematic and transparent procedures that include as wide a range of stakeholders as possible. Enhanced awareness and utilisation of expert opinion is required for modelling that meets the informational needs of deliberative fora. These conclusions in no way diminish the importance of conventional science and scientific opinion but recognise the need for a paradigmatic shift from traditional ideals of unbiased and impartial experts towards unbiased processes of expert contestation and a plurality of expertise and eventually models. Priority must be given to the quality of the enquiry for those responsible for environmental management and policy formulation, and this review emphasises the role for science to maintain and enhance the rigour and formality of the information that informs decision making. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据