4.7 Article

Modelling water dynamics with DNDC and DAISY in a soil of the North China Plain: A comparative study

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 583-598

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.003

关键词

DNDC; Daisy; North China Plain; China; Soil water content; Modelling; Model evaluation; Model comparison

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Education (MoE)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of the DNDC and Daisy model to simulate the water dynamics in a floodplain soil of the North China Plain was tested and compared. While the DNDC model uses a simple cascade approach, the Daisy model applies the physically based Richard's equation for simulating water movement in soil. For model testing a three years record of the soil water content from the Dong Bei Wang experimental station near Beijing was used. There, the effect of nitrogen fertilization, irrigation and straw removal on soil water and nitrogen dynamics was investigated in a three factorial field experiment applying a split-split-plot design with 4 replications. The dataset of one treatment was used for model testing and calibration. Two other independent datasets from further treatments were employed for validating the models. For both models, the simulation results were not satisfying using default parameters. After parameter optimisation and the use of site-specific van Genuchten parameters, however, the Daisy model performed well. But, for the DNDC model, parameter optimisation failed to improve the simulation result. Owing to the fact that many biological processes such as plant growth, nitrification or denitrification depend strongly on the soil water content, our findings bring us to the conclusion that the site-specific suitability of the DNDC model for simulating the soil water dynamics should be tested before further simulation of other processes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据