4.7 Review

Modelling with knowledge: A review of emerging semantic approaches to environmental modelling

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 577-587

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.09.009

关键词

Semantic modelling; Ontologies; Semantic annotation; Model and data integration; Conceptual design; Model-based query

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [0640837]
  2. European Union [010036-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Models, and to a lesser extent datasets, embody sophisticated statements of environmental knowledge. Yet, the knowledge they incorporate is rarely self-contained enough for them to be understood and used by humans or machines - without the modeller's mediation. This severely limits the options in reusing environmental models and connecting them to datasets or other models. The notion of declarative modelling has been suggested as a remedy to help design, communicate, share and integrate models. Yet, not all these objectives have been achieved by declarative modelling in its current implementations. Semantically aware environmental modelling is a way of designing, implementing and deploying environmental datasets and models based on the independent, standardized formalization of the underlying environmental science. It can be seen as the result of merging the rationale of declarative modelling with modern knowledge representation theory, through the mediation of the integrative vision of a Semantic Web. In this paper, we review the present and preview the future of semantic modelling in environmental science: from the mediation approach, where formal knowledge is the key to automatic integration of datasets, models and analytical pipelines, to the knowledge-cl riven approach, where the knowledge is the key not only to integration, but also to overcoming scale and paradigm differences and to novel potentials for model design and automated knowledge discovery. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据