4.7 Article

Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 846-858

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.007

关键词

integrated modeling; decision support; scenario analysis; water resources management; sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The call for more effective integration of science and decision making is ubiquitous in environmental management. While scientists often complain that their input is ignored by decision makers, the latter have also expressed dissatisfaction that critical information for their decision making is often not readily available or accessible to them, or not presented in a usable form. It has been suggested that scientists need to produce more usable information with enhanced credibility, legitimacy, and saliency to ensure the adoption of research results. In basin-scale management of coupled human-water systems, water resources managers, like other decision makers, are frequently confronted with the need to make major decisions in the face of high system complexity and uncertainty. The integration of useful and relevant scientific information is necessary and critical to enable informed decision-making. This paper describes the main aspects of what has been learned in the process of supporting sustainable water resources planning and management in the semi-arid southwestern United States by means of integrated modeling. Our experience indicates that particular attention must be paid to the proper definition of focus questions, explicit conceptual modeling, a suitable modeling strategy, and a formal scenario analysis approach in order to facilitate the development of usable scientific information. We believe that these lessons and insights can be useful to other scientific efforts in the broader area of linking environmental science with decision making. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据