4.2 Article

Quantification of a Primary Production Model Using Two Versions of the Spectral Distribution of the Phytoplankton Absorption Coefficient

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 431-440

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-011-9305-z

关键词

Bio-optical modeling; Phytoplankton; Primary production; Optically active substances

资金

  1. Estonian Ministry of Education [03962480s03, 0712699s05, 170011s08]
  2. Estonian Science Foundation [5594, 7156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a recent publication, we discussed and presented a semi-empirical phytoplankton primary production model. In the present paper, our main purpose is to determine how the algorithms of a primary production model change when different values of specific absorption coefficient by phytoplankton are used in the model. A new version of our earlier model was quantified for this purpose. Differences between the previous and the new models are as follows: (a) the spectra of the specific absorption coefficient of light by phytoplankton differ in the new model from those used in the previous model, and (b) the quantification of the new model brings about a change in the parameters of the algorithm for the quantum yield of carbon fixation. We compared the results of primary production profiles obtained by the new model with those measured in situ and also with the values obtained by the previous model. Due to an adequate choice of quantification parameters, both the old and new models give rather close values of phytoplankton primary production. In the present study, the computational algorithms of both models have been automated. The resulting programs calculate the temporal-spatial variability of phytoplankton primary production, providing hourly values from morning to evening, daily sums, and monthly sums. The input of a table of initial parameters and selected depths produces rapid calculations of the model's results, which are given as vertical profiles of primary production and areal values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据