4.6 Article

Physiological characterization of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacterium CandidatusJettenia caeni'

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 2172-2189

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12674

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Government of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Japan and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) project from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25850076] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, six candidate genera of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria have been identified, and numerous studies have been conducted to understand their ecophysiology. In this study, we examined the physiological characteristics of an anammox bacterium in the genus CandidatusJettenia'. Planctomycete KSU-1 was found to be a mesophilic (20-42.5 degrees C) and neutrophilic (pH 6.5-8.5) bacterium with a maximum growth rate of 0.0020h(-1). Planctomycete KSU-1 cells showed typical physiological and structural features of anammox bacteria; i.e. N-29(2) gas production by coupling of (NH4+)-N-15 and (NO2-)-N-14, accumulation of hydrazine with the consumption of hydroxylamine and the presence of anammoxosome. In addition, the cells were capable of respiratory ammonification with oxidation of acetate. Notably, the cells contained menaquinone-7 as a dominant respiratory quinone. Proteomic analysis was performed to examine underlying core metabolisms, and high expressions of hydrazine synthase, hydrazine dehydrogenase, hydroxylamine dehydrogenase, nitrite/nitrate oxidoreductase and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase were detected. These proteins require iron or copper as a metal cofactor, and both were dominant in planctomycete KSU-1 cells. On the basis of these experimental results, we proposed the name Ca. Jettenia caeni' sp. nov. for the bacterial clade of the planctomycete KSU-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据