4.6 Article

D-Xylose assimilation via the Weimberg pathway by solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas taiwanensis VLB120

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 156-170

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12537

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research and Technology of North Rhine-Westphalia (Bio.NRW, Technology Platforms: Biocatalysis-RedoxCell and PolyOmics)
  2. Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research of North Rhine-Westphalia in the frame of the CLIB-Graduate Cluster Industrial Biotechnology [314 - 108 001 08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural ability of Pseudomonas taiwanensisVLB120 to use xylose as sole carbon and energy source offers a high potential for sustainable industrial biotechnology. In general, three xylose assimilation routes are reported for bacteria. To elaborate the metabolic capacity of P.taiwanensisVLB120 and to identify potential targets for metabolic engineering, an in silico/in vivo experiment was designed, allowing for discrimination between these pathways. Kinetics of glucose and xylose degradation in P.taiwanensisVLB120 was determined and the underlying stoichiometry was investigated by genome-based metabolic modelling and tracer studies using stable isotope labelling. Additionally, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments have been performed to link physiology to the genomic inventory. Based on in silico experiments, a labelling strategy was developed, ensuring a measurable and unique C-13-labelling distribution in proteinogenic amino acids for every possible distribution between the different xylose metabolization routes. A comparison with in vivo results allows the conclusion that xylose is metabolized by P.taiwanensisVLB120 via the Weimberg pathway. Transcriptomic and physiological studies point to the biotransformation of xylose to xylonate by glucose dehydrogenase. The kinetics of this enzyme is also responsible for the preference of glucose as carbon source by cells growing in the presence of glucose and xylose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据