4.6 Article

A Group III histidine kinase (mhk1) upstream of high-osmolarity glycerol pathway regulates sporulation, multi-stress tolerance and virulence of Metarhizium robertsii, a fungal entomopathogen

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 817-829

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02643.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30930018, 31021033]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [2009CB118904, 2011AA10A204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of Metarhizium robertsii Group III histidine kinase (mhk1) in regulating various phenotypes of the fungal entomopathogen and the transcripts of 25 downstream genes likely associated with the phenotypes were probed by constructing Delta mhk1 and Delta mhk1/mhk1 mutants. All examined Delta mhk1 phenotypes except unchanged sensitivity to fungicide (dimethachlon) differed significantly from those of wild type and Delta mhk1/mhk1, which were similar to each other. Significant phenotypic changes in Delta mhk1 included increased conidial yields on two media, increased tolerance to H2O2, decreased tolerance to menadione, increased tolerance to hyperosmolarity, increased conidial thermotolerance, decreased conidial UV-B resistance and reduced virulence to Tenebrio molitor larvae. The mhk1 disruption elevated the transcripts of nine genes, including two associated with conidiation (flbC and hymA) and three encoding catalases but decreased seven other gene transcripts, including three for superoxide dismultases, under normal conditions. The high-osmolarity glycerol pathway MAPK phosphorylation level in Delta mhk1 culture was increased 1.0- to 1.8-fold by KCl, sucrose and menadione stresses but reduced drastically by H2O2 or heat (40 degrees C) stress, accompanied with different transcript patterns of all examined genes under the stresses. Our results confirmed the crucial role of mhk1 in regulating the expression of the downstream genes and associated phenotypes important for the fungal biocontrol potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据