4.6 Article

Taxonomic resolution, ecotypes and the biogeography of Prochlorococcus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 823-832

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01803.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Biological Oceanography,
  2. NSF C-MORE
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  4. University of California
  5. Danish National Science Foundation
  6. UK Natural Environment Research Council through the Atlantic Meridional Transect consortium [NER/O/S/2001/00680]
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/O/S/2001/00680] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to expand our understanding of the diversity and biogeography of Prochlorococcus ribotypes, we PCR-amplified, cloned and sequenced the 16S/23S rRNA ITS region from sites in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Ninety-three per cent of the ITS sequences could be assigned to existing Prochlorococcus clades, although many novel subclades were detected. We assigned the sequences to operational taxonomic units using a graduated scale of sequence identity from 80% to 99.5% and correlated Prochlorococcus diversity with respect to environmental variables and dispersal time between the sites. Dispersal time was estimated using a global ocean circulation model. The significance of specific environmental variables was dependent on the degree of sequence identity used to define a taxon: light correlates with broad-scale diversity (90% cut-off), temperature with intermediate scale (95%) whereas no correlation with phosphate was observed. Community structure was correlated with dispersal time between sample sites only when taxa were defined using the finest sequence similarity cut-off. Surprisingly, the concentration of nitrate, which cannot be used as N source by the Prochlorococcus strains in culture, explains some variation in community structure for some definitions of taxa. This study suggests that the spatial distribution of Prochlorococcus ecotypes is shaped by a hierarchy of environmental factors as well dispersal limitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据