4.6 Article

Isotopic evidence for the provenance and turnover of organic carbon by soil microorganisms in the Antarctic dry valleys

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 597-608

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01830.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Society (of London)
  2. TransAntarctic Association
  3. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  5. Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (New Zealand)
  6. Scottish Government Rural Environment Research and Analysis Directorate
  7. NERC [NE/D00893X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D00893X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extremely cold and arid Antarctic dry valleys are one of the most environmentally harsh terrestrial ecosystems supporting organisms in which the biogeochemical transformations of carbon are exclusively driven by microorganisms. The natural abundance of (13)C and (15)N in source organic materials and soils have been examined to obtain evidence for the provenance of the soil organic matter and the C loss as CO(2) during extended incubation (approximately 1200 days at 10 degrees C under moist conditions) has been used to determine the potential decay of soil organic C. The organic matter in soils remote from sources of liquid water or where lacustrine productivity was low had isotope signatures characteristic of endolithic (lichen) sources, whereas at more sheltered and productive sites, the organic matter in the soils that was a mixture mainly lacustrine detritus and moss-derived organic matter. Soil organic C declined by up to 42% during extended incubation under laboratory conditions (equivalent to 50-73 years in the field on a thermal time basis), indicating relatively fast turnover, consistent with previous studies indicating mean residence times for soil organic C in dry valley soils in the range 52-123 years and also with recent inputs of relatively labile source materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据