期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 120, 期 1, 页码 6-10出版社
US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103904
关键词
American Indian; data sharing; informed consent; intellectual property; IRB; research ethics; sovereignty; tribal
资金
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [P42ES016465]
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P42ES016465] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
BACKGROUND: When conducting research with American Indian tribes, informed consent beyond conventional institutional review board (IRB) review is needed because of the potential for adverse consequences at a community or governmental level that are unrecognized by academic researchers. OBJECTIVES: In this article, we review sovereignty, research ethics, and data-sharing considerations when doing community-based participatory health related or natural-resource related research with American Indian nations and present a model material and data-sharing agreement that meets tribal and university requirements. DISCUSSION: Only tribal nations themselves can identify potential adverse outcomes, and they can do this only if they understand the assumptions and methods of the proposed research. Tribes must be truly equal partners in study design, data collection, interpretation, and publication. Advances in protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are also applicable to IRB reviews, as are principles of sovereignty and indigenous rights, all of which affect data ownership and control. CONCLUSIONS: Academic researchers engaged in tribal projects should become familiar with all three areas: sovereignty, ethics and informed consent, and IPR. We recommend developing an agreement with tribal partners that reflects both health-related IRB and natural-resource related IPR considerations.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据