4.7 Article

World Health Organization Discontinues Its Drinking-Water Guideline for Manganese

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 120, 期 6, 页码 775-778

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104693

关键词

drinking-water; guideline; manganese; public health; World Health Organization

资金

  1. Norwich University
  2. Better Life Laboratories
  3. Research Institute of the Hospital for Sick Children
  4. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) released the fourth edition of Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality in July 2011. In this edition, the 400-mu g/L drinking-water guideline for manganese (Mn) was discontinued with the assertion that because this health-based value is well above concentrations of manganese normally found in drinking water, it is not considered necessary to derive a formal guideline value. OBJECTIVE: In this commentary, we review the WHO guideline for Mn in drinking water-from its introduction in 1958 through its discontinuation in 2011. METHODS: For the primary references, we used the WHO publications that documented the Mn guidelines. We used peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, published conference proceedings, and theses to identify countries with drinking water or potential drinking-water supplies exceeding 400 mu g/L Mn and peer-reviewed journal articles to summarize the health effects of Mn. DISCUSSION: Drinking water or potential drinking-water supplies with Mn concentrations >400 mu g/L are found in a substantial number of countries worldwide. The drinking water of many tens of millions of people has Mn concentrations >400 mu g/L. Recent research on the health effects of Mn suggests that the earlier WHO guideline of 400 mu g/L may have been too high to adequately protect public health. CONCLUSIONS: The toxic effects and geographic distribution of Mn in drinking-water supplies justify a reevaluation by the WHO of its decision to discontinue its drinking-water guideline for Mn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据