4.7 Article

Urinary Phthalate Metabolites in Relation to Preterm Birth in Mexico City

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 117, 期 10, 页码 1587-1592

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0800522

关键词

case-control; environment; epidemiology; exposure; pregnancy; prematurity

资金

  1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences [R01 ES 007821, P42 ES 05947]
  2. University of Michigan School of Public Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Rates of preterm birth have been rising over the past several decades. Factors contributing to this trend remain largely unclear, and exposure to environmental contaminants may play a role. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationship between phthalate exposure and preterm birth. METHODS: Within a large Mexican birth cohort study, we compared third-trimester urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in 30 women who delivered preterm (< 37 weeks of gestation) with those of 30 controls (>= 37 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: Concentrations of most of the metabolites were similar to those reported among U.S. females, although in the present study mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP) concentrations were higher and monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) concentrations lower. In a crude comparison before correcting for urinary dilution, geometric mean urinary concentrations were higher for the phthalate metabolites MBP, MBzP, mono(3-carboxylpropyl)phthalate, and four metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate among women who subsequently delivered preterm. These differences remained, but were somewhat lessened, after correction by specific gravity or creatinine. In multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders, elevated odds of having phthalate metabolite concentrations above the median level were found. CONCLUSIONS: We found that phthalate exposure is prevalent among this group of pregnant women in Mexico and that some phthalates may be associated with preterm birth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据