4.7 Article

Pesticide Exposure and Hypertensive Disorders during Pregnancy

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 117, 期 9, 页码 1393-1396

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900672

关键词

pesticide exposure; preeclampsia; pregnancy-induced hypertension

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [Z01CP010119, ZIACP010119] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES049030, Z01ES049030, ZIAES045005, ZIAES049003] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 ES049030, Z01 CP010119] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCI NIH HHS [Z01 CP010119-12] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIEHS NIH HHS [Z01 ES 049030-11] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including pregnancy- induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia (PE), complicate 2-8% of pregnancies. Few studies have examined environmental risk factors in relation to these conditions. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to examine whether pesticide exposure during pregnancy was associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. METHODS: We analyzed self-reported data from 11,274 wives of farmers enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) between 1993 and 1997. Using logistic regression models, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for PIH and PE associated with pesticide-related activities during the first trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS: First-trimester residential and agricultural activities with potential exposure to pesticides were associated with both PIH [residential AOR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.60; agricultural AOR = 1.60; 95% Cl, 1.05-2.45] and PE (residential AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.70; agricultural AOR = 2.07; 95% Cl, 1.34-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to pesticides during pregnancy may increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Laboratory research may provide insights into relationships between pesticide exposure and hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据