4.7 Article

Breast-feeding protects against arsenic exposure in Bangladeshi infants

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 116, 期 7, 页码 963-969

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11094

关键词

arsenic; blood; breast milk; drinking water; infants; saliva; urine

资金

  1. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Chronic arsenic exposure causes a wide range of health effects, but little is known about critical windows of exposure. Arsenic readily crosses the Placenta, but the few available data on postnatal exposure to arsenic via breast milk are not conclusive. AIM: Our goal was to assess the arsenic exposure through breast milk in Bangladeshi infants, living in an area with high prevalence of arsenic-rich tube-well water. METHODS: We analyzed metabolites of inorganic arsenic in breast milk and infant urine at 3 months of age and compared them with detailed information on breast-feeding practices and maternal arsenic exposure, as measured by concentrations in blood, urine, and saliva. RESULTS: Arsenic concentrations in breast-milk samples were low (median, 1 mu g/kg; range, 0.25-19 mu g/kg), despite high arsenic exposures via drinking water (10-1,100 mu g/L in urine and 2-40 mu g/L in red blood cells). Accordingly, the arsenic concentrations in urine of infants whose mothers reported exclusive breast-feeding were low (median, 1.1 mu g/L; range, 0.3-29 mu g/L), whereas concentrations for those whose mothers reported partial breast-feeding ranged from 0.4 to 1,520 mu g/L (median 1.9 mu g/L). The major part of arsenic in milk was inorganic. Still, the infants had a high fraction (median, 87%) of the dimethylated arsenic metabolite in urine. Arsenic in breast milk was associated with arsenic in maternal blood, urine, and saliva. CONCLUSION: Very little arsenic is excreted in breast milk, even in women with high exposure from drinking water. Thus, exclusive breast-feeding protects the infant from exposure to arsenic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据