4.2 Article

Measurements and modeling of open-channel flows with finite semi-rigid vegetation patches

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 113-134

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-013-9298-z

关键词

Adjustment length; Flow transition; Open-channel flow; Turbulence model; Vegetation patch; Aquatic vegetation

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530232]
  2. Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [5200/12E]
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrodynamics of flows through a finite length semi-rigid vegetation patch (VP) were investigated experimentally and numerically. Detailed measurements have been carried out to determine the spatial variation of velocity and turbulence profiles within the VP. The measurement results show that an intrusion region exists in which the peak Reynolds stress remains near the bed. The velocity profile is invariant within the downstream part of the VP while the Reynolds stress profile requires a longer distance to attain the spatially invariant state. Higher vegetation density leads to a shorter adjustment length of the transition region, and a higher turbulence level within the VP. The vegetation density used in the present study permits the passing through of water and causes the peak Reynolds stress and turbulence kinetic energy each the maximum at the downstream end of the patch. A 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model incorporating the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence closure was employed subsequently to replicate the flow development within the VP. The model reproduced transitional flow characteristics well and the results are in good agreement with the experimental data. Additional numerical experiments show that the adjustment length can be scaled by the water depth, mean velocity and maximum shear stress. Empirical equations of the adjustment lengths for mean velocity and Reynolds stress were derived with coefficients quantified from the numerical simulation results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据