4.1 Article

Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in dental offices

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 175-182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12082

关键词

screening; dental office; prediabetes; diabetes; periodontal disease; epidemiology

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK092926] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesMost Americans see dentists at least once a year. Chair-side screening and referral may improve diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes. In this study, we developed a multivariate model to screen for dysglycemia (prediabetes and diabetes defined as HbA1c 5.7 percent) using information readily available to dentists and assessed the prevalence of dysglycemia in general dental practices. MethodsWe recruited 1,033 adults 30 years of age without histories of diabetes from 13 general dental practices. A sample of 181 participants selected on the basis of random capillary glucose levels and periodontal status underwent definitive diagnostic testing with hemoglobin A1c. Logistic models were fit to identify risk factors for dysglycemia, and sample weights were applied to estimate the prevalence of dysglycemia in the population 30 years of age. ResultsIndividuals at high risk for dysglycemia could be identified using a questionnaire that assessed sex, history of hypertension, history of dyslipidemia, history of lost teeth, and either self-reported body mass index 35kg/m(2) (severe obesity) or random capillary glucose 110mg/dl. We estimate that 30 percent of patients 30 years of age seen in these general dental practices had dysglycemia. ConclusionsThere is a substantial burden of dysglycemia in patients seen in general dental practices. Simple chair-side screening for dysglycemia that includes or does not include fingerstick random capillary glucose testing can be used to rapidly identify high-risk patients. Practical implicationsFurther studies are needed to demonstrate the acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of chair-side screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据