4.4 Article

How Will Species Respond to Climate Change? Examining the Effects of Temperature and Population Density on an Herbivorous Insect

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 312-319

出版社

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1603/EN09294

关键词

temperature; grasshoppers; density dependence; intraspecific competition; metabolism

资金

  1. University of Notre Dame Environmental Research Center
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0918306] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important challenge facing ecologists is to understand how climate change may affect species performance and species interactions. However, predicting how changes in abiotic variables associated with climate change may affect species performance also depends on the biotic context, which can mediate species responses to climatic change. We conducted a 3-yr field experiment to determine how the herbivorous grasshopper Camnula pellucida (Scudder) responds to manipulations of temperature and population density. Grasshopper survival and fecundity decreased with density, indicating the importance of intraspecific competition. Female fecundity tended to increase with temperature, whereas grasshopper survival exhibited a unimodal response to temperature, with highest survival at intermediate temperatures. Grasshopper performance responses to temperature also depended on density. Peak survival in the low-density treatment occurred in warmer conditions than for the high-density treatment, indicating that the intensity of intraspecific competition varies with temperature. Our data show that changes to the temperature regimen can alter grasshopper performance and determine the intensity of intraspecific competition. However, the effects of temperature on grasshopper performance varied with density. Our data indicate the importance of the biotic context in mediating species responses to climatic factors associated with global change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据