4.3 Article

Evaluation Method for Spore Concentration Uniformity on a Fungal Substrate: Use of a Real-Time Aerosolization Technique

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 861-866

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2008.0334

关键词

fungal spore concentration; airborne fungal particles; multiorifice air jet; rotating substrate

资金

  1. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
  2. Brain Korea 21 program of the South Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aerosolization characteristics of the fungal spores are affected by many environmental variables. The uniformity and distribution of spore concentrations on a fungal substrate is an important parameter for the stable and constant generation of fungal bioaerosols over long time periods. However, this traditional method using a light microscope is very slow and inefficient in evaluating the uniformity of spores on fungal substrates. In this study, we propose an evaluation method for spore concentration uniformity on fungal substrates using the real-time aerosolization characteristics of the fungal spores. A fungal bioaerosol generator, developed previously, was used for the steady aerosolization of fungal spores. The multiorifice air jets and the rotating substrate inside the generator were used to scan a fungal culture Petri plate and to aerosolize the fungal spores. Experimental tests on Cladosporium cladosporioides were conducted. The particle size distribution and total spore concentration of aerosolized fungal spores were measured using a particle-size distribution analyzer and a condensation particle counter. The results demonstrate that it is possible to evaluate the uniformity of the spore concentration of fungi on a substrate by measuring the variance of the particle concentration in real time. In addition, the uniformity of the fungal spore concentration has little effect on the particle size distribution under the selected experimental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据