4.6 Article

Bioaccessibility and source identification of heavy metals in agricultural soils contaminated by mining activities

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 77, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-018-7783-x

关键词

Mining activities; Heavy metals; Bioaccessibility; Spatial distribution; PMF model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401588]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large amounts of heavy metal are released by mining and industrial activities to the surrounding environment, raising great concerns regarding the effects of environmental exposure to pollutants on human health. A combination of total and bioaccessible contents, spatial analysis, cluster analysis, and positive matrix factorization model was successfully used to determine the status and sources of heavy metals in a small farmland under long-term influences of mining and industries activities in this study. The results show that the average contents of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) in agricultural soils exceed the Chinese national standard 2.18, 5.95, 3.46, and 1.33 times, respectively. Cd poses the highest potential on human health with a mean geo-accumulation index (I-geo) of 4.51 and a bioaccessible ratio of 37.41%, followed by Pb, which has a mean I-geo of 1.58 and a bioaccessible ratio of 63.24%. The significant correlation (P<0.01) was found between the total and bioaccessible four contaminated metal contents (As, Cd, Pb, and Zn), indicating that total concentration of heavy metals could be effective indicators on bioaccessibility in this study. The As was attributed to the atmospheric deposition, Cd and Zn were mainly derived from mining activities, and Pb contamination is highly related with cement plant. Compared to atmospheric deposition, industrial activities, and soil parent materials, mining activities has the greatest influence on the enrichments of the total heavy metals in agricultural soils with the proportion of 47.9%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据