4.6 Article

Spatio-temporal analysis of ground subsidence due to underground coal mining in Huainan coalfield, China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 73, 期 9, 页码 5523-5534

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3806-4

关键词

Ground subsidence; Coal mining; SBAS; Stacking; InSAR; Huainan; China

资金

  1. National Key Technology R & D Program of China [2012BAC10B02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 41372353]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. Huainan Mining Group [HNKY-JT-JS-(2013)-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Underground coal mining produces ground subsidence that adversely impacts the environment. Huainan coalfield, one of the largest coalfields in East China, experiences fast ground subsidence that restricts agricultural, urban and rural developments in this region. We used stacking and the small baseline subset interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) techniques to perform a spatio-temporal analysis of ground subsidence in Huainan coalfield caused by underground coal mining activities. Fourteen L-band ALOS PALSAR images acquired during 2007-2010 were used to retrieve high-resolution and high-precision time series of ground deformation and the mean deformation rate. The results show that subsidence with a rate of up to 15 cm/year is widely spread over the studied area in response to mining operation. In regions where mining lasted for many years, ground subsidence continues at a steady rate during the entire observation period. In regions of recent (i.e., since 2007-2009) mining activities, ground subsidence is rapidly accelerating. Accumulated subsidence already caused submerging of the agriculture lands, limiting further mining activities and farming. The InSAR results are consistent with the ground leveling measurements and observations. It is confirmed that the L-band InSAR can be successfully utilized for mapping long-term subsidence in Huainan coalfield in China caused by underground coal mining activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据