4.6 Article

Trace elements of the soil-plant systems in subtropical karst and clasolite areas in Guilin, Guangxi, China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 73, 期 10, 页码 6259-6269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3849-6

关键词

Geochemistry; Karst area; Natural plants; Rhizosphere soil; Trace elements

资金

  1. Natural Scientific Foundation for Young Scientists of China [41402326]
  2. Natural Scientific Foundation for Young Scientists of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China [2013GXNSFBA019217]
  3. Natural Scientific Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China [Gui-kehe14125008-2-1]
  4. China Geological Survey [1212010911062, S-2010-KP03-07-02, 12120113005300]
  5. Ministry of Land and Resources [201211086-05]
  6. Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS [2012005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transfer processes of trace elements within the soil-plant system is part of the biochemical cycling of chemical elements-representing a flow of elements from nonliving to living compartments in biosphere. Trace elements distribution in soil-plant system is a key issue in assessing their mobility and availability in soils. This study was conducted to assess the transfer mechanism of copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), strontium (Sr) and zinc (Zn) in eleven natural plants and associated rhizosphere soils in subtropical karst and clasolite areas, Southwestern China, using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy. Trace elements except Sr are rich in the limestone soil of the karst area, whereas they are dispersed in the red soil of the clasolite area. Moreover, their active rates in the limestone soil are greatly reduced, compared with the red soil. Contents of trace elements in plants are both affected by the geochemical and biogeochemical characteristics of trace elements. Distributions of trace elements are related to plants' physiological characteristics, trace elements' chemical characteristics, and geological background as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据