4.6 Article

Investigating arsenic (As) occurrence and sources in ground, surface, waste and drinking water in northern Mongolia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 649-662

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-3029-0

关键词

Arsenic pollution; Drinking water; Gold mining; Mongolia; Upper Selenga River Basin

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03300762]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [D 10 00351, A/12/97034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated levels of arsenic in drinking water are found in several parts of Asia. Prolonged intakes of even low concentrations typically have serious health effects. This research paper integrates results of various studies on arsenic contamination of ground, surface, waste and drinking water in north-central Mongolia. Samples were analyzed with the ARSOlux biosensor and the Arsenator field test kit as well as different spectrometric methods (ICP-MS, ICP-OES). Altogether 309 samples were tested for their arsenic concentration, 44 of them with more than one technique. In the study region, the enrichment of heavy metals in surface waters is often linked to mining and coal combustion. The highest concentration of arsenic (As) was detected in the effluent of a gold mine (up to 2,820 mu g L-1) and in the ash basin of a thermal power plant (up to 1,170 mu g L-1). Five of 54 drinking water samples and 16 of 184 river samples were found to contain As levels above the World Health Organization (WHO) maximum permissible limit (10 mu g L-1), with a maximum of 300 mu g L-1 As. In addition, elevated levels of uranium were detected. The degree and extent of As concentrations exceeding WHO standards were previously unknown and demonstrate the necessity for a more intensive screening as well as possible interventions concerning the intake of arsenic-contaminated drinking water. Preliminary results indicate that the ARSOlux biosensor technology is well suited for a precise quantification of arsenic content at low detection limits in regions where access to central laboratories is difficult.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据