4.6 Article

Evaluation of changes in ecological security in China's Qinghai Lake Basin from 2000 to 2013 and the relationship to land use and climate change

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 341-354

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2955-1

关键词

Qinghai Lake Basin; Ecological security; Climate change; Land use; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41030535, 31000229]
  2. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  4. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecological security evaluation is an important way to identify the need for improvement in a watershed and to assess the degree of regional sustainable development. Using a driver-pressure-state-exposure-response model, a comprehensive system of ecological security indicators was developed, and it was demonstrated in a case study of the main ecological problems facing the Qinghai Lake Basin. Indicators of the status of the natural ecological environment, socioeconomic pressure, and the degree of environmental damage were chosen to develop the model, and comprehensively evaluated the basin's ecological security in 2000, 2004, 2009, and 2013 to reveal changes in the ecological security in response to changing climate and land use. The overall ecological security of the basin improved from 2000 to 2013, with considerable restoration and reconstruction of the ecosystem. From 2000 to 2004, environmental deterioration increased slightly as a result of pollution caused by human activities, excess land reclamation for agriculture, land desertification, and grassland degeneration. However, the obvious effect of ecological protection policies, such as conversion of farmland into grassland and stall feeding of livestock instead of grazing, led to improvement of the ecological environment from 2004 to 2013. Ecological security in the basin increased with increasing precipitation during the study period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据