4.6 Article

Contamination assessment and health risk of heavy metals in dust from Changqing industrial park of Baoji, NW China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 2095-2104

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2613-7

关键词

Heavy metal; Pollution assessment; Health risk; Dust; Baoji

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271510]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [GK 201305008, GK 201302032, GK 201101002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contents of Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in the dust samples collected from Changqing industrial park of Baoji city, NW China, were measured by XRF, while As and Hg in the dust samples were analyzed by AFS. Geo-accumulation index (I (geo)), pollution index (PI) and integrated pollution index (IPI) were calculated to evaluate the heavy metal contamination level of dust. The health risk due to exposure to heavy metals in dust was analyzed by the Health Risk Assessment Model of US EPA. The results show that the arithmetic means of As, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn are 23.3, 16.4, 1591.8, 178.2, 0.243, 346.5, 40.2, 1,586.2 and 1,918.8 mg kg(-1), respectively, which are higher than the background values of Shaanxi soil, especially for Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn. The mean values of I (geo) reveal the order of Pb > Zn > Cr > Hg > Cu > As > Co > Ni > Mn. The high I (geo) of Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb and Zn in dust indicates that there is considerable pollution from Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb and Zn, while the low I (geo) of As, Co, Mn and Ni presents no pollution in dust. The assessment results of PI support the results of I (geo), and IPI indicates heavy metals in dust polluted seriously. The health risk assessment shows that ingestion of dust particles is the route for exposure to heavy metals from dust, followed by dermal adsorption. Exposure to As, Cr and Pb from dust may pose a potential health threat to children and adults. The risk of cancer from As, Co, Cr and Ni due to dust exposure is low.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据