4.6 Article

Susceptibility assessments of the Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides in Longnan using logistic regression

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 731-743

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2475-z

关键词

Wenchuan earthquake; Longnan; Landslide susceptibility; Logistic regression; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40801212, 40930531]
  2. Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection of Chendu University of Technology, China [SKLGP2012K012]
  3. ESA-MOST Dragon 3 Cooperation Program [10606]
  4. 51st Chinese PostDoc Science Foundation [2012M511298]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study a Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility assessment was carried out in the Longnan area in northwestern China using a GIS-based logistic regression model. This region has frequently been affected by landslides in the past, and was intensively affected by the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake which received considerable international attention. The data used for this study consist of the landslides triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake and a landslide pre-disposing factor database. Information regarding the landslide causative factors came from additional data sources, such as a digital elevation model (DEM) with a 30 x 30 m(2) resolution, orthophotos, geological and land-use maps, precipitation records, and information on peak ground acceleration data from the 2008 earthquake. The statistical analysis of the relationship between the Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides and pre-disposing factors showed the great influence of lithological and topographical conditions on slope failures. The quality of susceptibility mapping was validated by splitting the study area into training and validation sections. The prediction capability analysis demonstrated that the landslide susceptibility map could be used for land planning as well as emergency planning by local authorities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据