4.3 Review

Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 19-36

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S037689291200029X

关键词

adaptive comanagement; decision-making; environmental management; evidence-based conservation; knowledge exchange; knowledge management; knowledge transfer; participation; research impact; social learning

资金

  1. Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU)
  2. UK's Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  4. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  5. NERC BESS programme
  6. ESRC [ES/G021694/1, ES/H037144/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/K001620/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H037144/1, RES-496-26-0040, ES/G021694/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K001620/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据