4.3 Article

Continued loss of temperate old-growth forests in the Romanian Carpathians despite an increasing protected area network

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 182-193

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892912000355

关键词

biodiversity governance; Central and Eastern Europe; deforestation; disturbance; forest restitution; Landsat; Natura 2000; old-growth forests; protected areas; remote sensing

资金

  1. European Union [VOLANTE FP7-ENV-2010-265104]
  2. NASA Land Use and Land Cover Change Program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX09AK88G]
  3. Belgian Science Policy, Research Program for Earth Observation Stereo II [SR/00/133]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [P504/10/1644]
  5. Einstein Foundation
  6. NASA [113913, NNX09AK88G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Old-growth forests around the world are vanishing rapidly and have been lost almost completely from the European temperate forest region. Poor management practices, often triggered by socioeconomic and institutional change, are the main causes of loss. Recent trends in old-growth forest cover in Romania, where some of the last remaining tracts of these forests within Europe are located, are revealed by satellite image analysis. Forest cover declined by 1.3% from 2000 to 2010. Romania's protected area network has been expanded substantially since the country's accession to the European Union in 2007, and most of the remaining old-growth forests now are located within protected areas. Surprisingly though, 72% of the old-growth forest disturbances are found within protected areas, highlighting the threats still facing these forests. It appears that logging in old-growth forests is, at least in part, related to institutional reforms, insufficient protection and ownership changes since the collapse of communism in 1989. The majority of harvesting activities in old-growth forest areas are in accordance with the law. Without improvements to their governance, the future of Romania's old-growth forests and the important ecosystem services they provide remains uncertain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据