4.5 Review

Progress in understanding the use of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) - back to basics

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 1-13

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/EN11084

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H002480/1, ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [NE/H002480/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) is now widely used to measure a range of determinands in waters, soils and sediments. In most cases the mass accumulated is interpreted in terms of a labile form of the component being measured using a simple equation that applies to steady-state conditions. During the past decade several publications have revealed phenomena that question some of the assumptions necessary for use of the simple equation. This review systematically examines the available evidence relating to appropriate geometry, possible charge effects, binding of solutes and ligands to the diffusive gel and filter, the rate of reaction with the binding layer, the effects of solution complexation and kinetic limitation, necessary time for deployment and the measurement of nanoparticles. DGT emerges as a robust monitoring tool for labile components in solution. Although there is evidence, for some conditions, of binding of metals and, more moderately, humic substances to the diffusive gel and filter membrane, this is unlikely to affect DGT measurement in natural waters for deployment times exceeding a few days. Detailed speciation and kinetic studies require a more thorough interpretation of the mass accumulated by DGT. A coherent theory has emerged for relatively simple solutions, but systems with complex heterogeneous ligands, as is the case for natural waters, are challenging. The size discrimination of DGT is still poorly known. Systematic measurements with well characterised nanoparticles are required to define the distribution of pore sizes in the gels and to establish the contribution of natural colloids to the DGT measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据